The search found 1192 results in 0.52 seconds.
Early-career scientists need to balance career imperatives against the need for complete and transparent reporting.
Your writing should reflect the same clarity and concision as your research.
The Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine is only the beginning.
Most other scientists will be far more interested in whatthey think your results mean than in what you think they mean.
The first author on the paper, Yu-yi Lin, died in the lab last year, apparently by his own hand.
[H]ow can you be certain that the journals editor and peer reviewers will agree that your paper merits publication?
"His lab mantra was, 'It's better to ask forgiveness than permission,' 'If I don't know about it, it doesn't happen,' [and] 'Get it done at all costs, and don't tell me how.' " --Maura Lee Upright
A British scientist is going to prison for 3 months for falsifying data.
Writing well comes from writing a lot, so get comfy with your computer.
"What researchers--authors--tend to overlook in the fight for credit is that the coin has two sides--one is credit, and the other, inseparable, is responsibility for the work's integrity."
"You can't affect the layout of the room or the timing of your session, but you can still do a lot to make sure that your research results stand a chance of attracting the attention they deserve"
If you have a good idea, don't just throw it into a grant application--do the pilot experiment and get that result in hand.
"It's amazing how presenting your paper in a nutshell makes the real worth of your discovery shine."
© 2013 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All Rights Reserved.
AAAS is a partner of HINARI, AGORA, OARE, PatientInform, CrossRef, and COUNTER.
You have reached the bottom of the page. Back to top