Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Section Search, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
|
|
Career Development : Articles
“In the last 15 years, I had some good intuition that I always made sure I followed up on,” says Pierre Dutilleul, an applied statistician at McGillUniversity. The Greener Side of Math: A Statistician in the Plant Science World
Andrew
Fazekas Whereas many people marvel at the natural beauty of plants and trees, when Pierre Dutilleul (pictured left) looks, he sees the mathematics behind their elegant designs. Although trained as a statistician--he is one of only a handful of stats-trained professors in the world situated in a plant science department--Dutilleul has spent 2 decades branching out. “I am curious and have an open mind,” he says. “I like to think that I am building bridges between the worlds of mathematics and applied sciences.” After 2 decades of research, he continues to build bridges between two distinct approaches, the theoretical and the experimental. Since joining the faculty of McGill University's Department of Plant Science in 1992, Dutilleul has teamed up with scores of applied researchers and graduate students, tackling diverse problems in the plant sciences, from agriculture to forest ecology. Because he is the department's resident statistician, his talents have remained in great demand by researchers looking to optimize experimental designs and spatio-temporal analyses. He has managed consistently to extract new information from data via powerful and efficient methods of estimating and testing. Branching Out Nowhere is the convergence of his mathematics and plant science works more evident than in the up-and-coming field of phytometrics. Best described as an offshoot of biometrics, the work involves collecting data on plant structures, such as root systems and branching patterns, and analyzing structural complexity statistically. Dutilleul and his McGill group have started by applying phytometrics to study the branching patterns in trees and assess the effects of architecture on the ability of a tree to capture light.
Researchers have long known that there is a relationship between light interception and the amount of leaves. But Dutilleul and his group have found a way to add a measure of branching complexity into this relationship. He hopes his research can shed light on CO2-recycling patterns in trees, and consequently, on climate change. “If we can understand better how trees with different structures intercept light in the process of photosynthesis, then we can try to grow trees of a given type or a given structure to do a better job in recycling CO2,” he explains.
By the time he finished his degree in 1990, he had published several papers in plant breeding and in agricultural economics and tree-ring series analysis in Africa. He had already decided that he did not want to be a theoretical mathematician; rather, he wanted to grow a career where he could develop and apply statistical models to applied sciences. He expanded his collaborations with chronobiologists, ecologists, and plant geneticists while doing a postdoc at Université de Montréal over the next 2 years.
Shaking the Tree Dutilleul believes his success has come in part from his desire to communicate with other scientists. Many times when people come to him with statistical questions, the answers that he gives set off a train of thought which leads to new ideas, just as with the tree branching study. He follows his instincts and hunches when choosing projects and does try not to let life’s chance events dictate the path his career will follow, despite the serendipity that led to his current position. “In the last 15 years, I had some good intuition that I always made sure I would follow up on,” says Dutilleul. “It’s good to have long-term objectives and a clear vision; even if the idea seems crazy at first sight, don’t give up.” Collaboration, says Dutilleul, is crucially important, and that requires good communication with a clear line of dialogue. “When people come to me with questions about statistical analysis of data, the first few minutes are spent on discussing the work they do in their field and what it means. Then I spend some time explaining what my work means.” Since he was hired in 1992, Dutilleul has seen both his own attitude and the attitudes of others around his department evolve. Working on what he describes as “real-world” problems has given him a deeper understanding of applied sciences, while his colleagues have come to treat him as one of their own, and as someone who can help them improve their research and bring it to a new level. He sees it as an exercise in translation between two languages. “I translate their questions and problems that are in apparently unrelated situations, using words and statistical concepts that are more familiar to me, and then try to form links with previous problems I have solved in the past. Some may have seen me as a ‘number cruncher’ the first time I came onboard, but I think those people have rapidly changed their minds.”
Andrew Fazekas is a correspondent at Next Wave and may be reached at afazekas@aaas.org. Related CONTENT
|
Business Office Features
Career Tools and ResourcesCurrent EmployersScience Careers ForumGraduate ProgramsHow-To Guides
Salary Tools |