Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Section Search, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
|
|
Career Development : Articles |
|
Credit: Victoria Rachitzky |
Carrot #1. I had my first performance review and it wasn't bad. In fact, it was rather good. It seems I'm back in a place--a government lab--where people will tell me honestly whether they're satisfied with the work I've done. No more guessing games! (I take that back. There will always be guessing games, but now there are fewer of them.) For this appraisal, I was asked to do my own evaluation of the following things: 1) what I have been able to accomplish since starting my postdoc (papers submitted, proposals written, conferences attended, talks given, students mentored, collaborations, and anything else relevant to my activity); 2) what I am planning to do in the coming year (research, papers, proposals, and so on--same list); 3) what I need to improve; and finally, 4) my career-development goals for the coming year.
And this little sheet of paper didn't just disappear into my adviser’s desk. We actually had a discussion about it! Shock! Awe!
As we progress in our careers, we owe it to ourselves to be honest about where we are and where we’re going. As easy as it is to float along, it's not a good time--it's never a good time--to be complacent. A rigorous performance review is a very fine thing (especially when it has a career-development component, and especially when it turns out well) but receiving one is a luxury that many academics--postdocs, grad students, and junior faculty--seldom receive. Sly, critical comments and subtle slights do not add up to a rigorous performance review.
If you don't have the luxury of receiving a proper performance review, AAAS (through Science Careers) and other organizations offer resources for doing your own. For instance, there's "Not Your Fathers Postdoc" and the FASEB resource discussed in this article.
Carrot #2. I've always been one to keep the doors to the past open. You never know when something or someone might walk through and give you that spark of encouragement you need to pursue a new idea you were thinking about. (A visit from an old friend can also be irritating/depressing/annoying, but this is a happy column!)
While on the trip to this wedding I spoke of, I went to visit some former co-workers, people with whom I have kept in touch over the years. The time was right to discuss new opportunities, including one to write a few science pieces for a general audience on some hot topics that interested me. We were talking about how life has progressed. I mentioned that I was attempting to write some articles for a general audience and my friends thought this was a fabulous idea. They just started throwing out titles and more ideas, along with encouragement to proceed!
All in all, it's shaping up to be a very busy summer. Things are looking up. The baby steps continue. It's still early in my postdoc, and I'm still not officially on the job market--no job interviews yet. I'm still looking for people to set up some informational interviews with so I can decide where I want to apply. I continue to explore ideas and things that interest me, keeping my eyes and ears open. Yes, life does go on as we toil away in the lab. But our years of toil have created opportunities. They're out there waiting for us if we bother to discover them. Are you ready to engage?
Comments? Questions? E-mail micella.phoenix.dewhyse@gmail.com.
|
Micella Phoenix DeWhyse is a pseudonym, obviously. |
Comments, suggestions? Please send your feedback to our editor. |
DOI: 10.1126/science.caredit.a0700092 |