Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Section Search, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
|
|
Career Development : ArticlesSpecial Feature: Sizing Up Nano
Jim
Austin The single hardest aspect of starting a career in nanoscience may be just figuring out what it is. That's because, as Robert F. Service observes in the lead story in this week's feature, "nano" isn't an industry or a scientific field. It's a scale--one where interesting things are happening in a wide range of scientific disciplines, from microbiology to microprocessors. It's also a scale at which scientists have learned, in recent years, how to manipulate matter. And that's why nanotechnology is hot. So just how hot is it? For one thing, it's one of very few emerging scientific topics that frequently pass the lips of people who aren't scientists. In the first 6 months of this year, the word "nanotechnology" occurred in 32 different articles in The New York Times, for example. Over the same 6-month period a decade earlier, the word appeared in the Times just three times. So how many times will the term occur, say, 5 years from now? And more to the point, how many of those mentions will be in the newspaper's employment section? It's a reasonable assumption that career prospects in a hot field are better than they would be in a cold one, but it's only an assumption. We wanted to do better than just make assumptions, so we turned to three accomplished writers--U.S.-based Service, who frequently writes about nanotechnology for Science magazine; Kate Travis, our contributing editor for northern Europe; and London-based Amarendra Swarup, one of the 2004 winners of The Daily Telegraph/Bayer Science Writing Awards, who wrote about Escaping the Postdoc for us in June and contributed to our research opportunities in India feature. We asked them to explore career prospects in nanoscience and nanotechnology. In Starting Small, Service concludes that there are indeed opportunities in nano for people with scientific training. The field may well be overhyped, but money is pouring in, and it seems to be at a stage in its development where many of the jobs are for researchers instead of, say, people who work on production lines. Service also asks--and answers--whether it's best to pursue interdisciplinary training or to earn your chops in an established discipline. Travis, meanwhile, analyzes a recent nanotechnology skills survey and concludes that, although there's no detailed consensus on what skills the industry is looking for, there are some broad themes. She tells us what they are. Finally, in How Will Nanotech Fare in Europe?, Swarup concludes that, although industry may have been a little slow to catch on, government funding for nanotechnology is generous, and the career prospects for current and future European nanotechnologists seem strong.
Related CONTENT
|
Business Office Features
Career Tools and ResourcesCurrent EmployersScience Careers ForumGraduate ProgramsHow-To Guides
Salary Tools |
||||||