INDEX OF ARTICLES
For many of us the first time we face the scrutiny of a
'serious' interview panel is when we try to convince a department
to take us on as a PhD student. You may have run the interview
gauntlet before then, for summer jobs for example, but the
stakes--a career in science, or not--have probably never been so
high. And as you progress--applying for postdocs, fellowships, and
(whisper it!) permanent academic positions, the pressure just keeps
piling on.
"Expressing a willingness to learn more or admitting a small
weakness will make you appear honest."
In an interview you may have as little as half an hour to give a
stunning, or at least solid, answer to the one main question from
each panel member. There could easily be six or more of them, and
not surprisingly the number of people gazing at you from across the
table seems to increase the higher the profile of the job. At the
other extreme you could be in for a 2-hour grilling session when
the challenge is to stay alert and sharp right until the end. But
whatever the format or duration of your ordeal you need to develop
a strategy that ensures you come up with the goods on your big
day.
You would be amazed at how many people just turn up for
interviews and give the first answers that come into their heads.
This usually has disastrous consequences for their chances of
getting the job. Worse still, some people have a well thought out
strategy that vanishes as soon as the door to the interview room
opens. Interviews do that to people.
In many ways an interview is like an oral examination. So why
not prepare as you would for an exam? You don't know the questions
beforehand but you can revise and try to second guess what might be
asked. But most importantly, make sure you give the right
performance to get the maximum mark--all the revision in the world
counts for diddly squat if you lose your self-control when you find
yourself 'on the hook'. I find the knack to a successful interview
is to practice being both relaxedandalert. Practice is
particularly essential if you feel these two states of mind are
mutually exclusive.
What the panel is testing is obvious:
a) Do they believe you can do the job well?
How can you expect the interview panel to pin down your good
qualities if you're not sure of them yourself? You also need to be
able to turn your not-so-positive attributes into something more
flattering (for example, you may have chaotic organisational
skills, but are finding tremendous help in the form of lists) or
demonstrate that they are outweighed by far by your skills in other
areas. So get the facts about yourself clear in your mind. You may
know you are strong in the lab but weak on writing up. Or you may
be an excellent lecturer but poor on project management. However
your SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis
shapes up, make sure you've sussed yourself out thoroughly and
honestly before you start. Getting constructive criticism from
colleagues will undoubtedly help a lot.
b) Do they like the look of you?
It's true to say it's called an 'interview' because they call
you 'in to view' you. Of course this has more to do with your
attitude than with your haircut or the colour of your tie or
blouse. You could seriously harm your chances with something as
trivial as not smiling at all during the interview. This will be
interpreted as either that you are not able to cope under pressure
or that you were born miserable. Not good.
You are a happy person and you are not under pressure. You are
relaxed, confident. You are likely to get lots of other offers. You
are on your way to the top. This is the impression you want to
create. This is the head-job you need to set in concrete in your
mind before you walk through that door.
c) Do you show any strong contra-indications for either a) or
b)?
Just one 'no-no' can turn the panel against you even if they
quite like you in all other respects.
In a nutshell, for the whole interview never cease to be
ENTHUSIASTIC (you're relaxed, so smile a little), ATTENTIVE (you
are alert, maintaining good eye-contact and nodding a fair bit),
and POSITIVE (give forward-looking answers).
WARNING! Do not go to the other extreme and appear cocky. No one
likes a cocky person. Even if your CV is strong and you've already
come across well during the interview, a little humbleness is
always a very positive thing. Expressing a willingness to learn
more or admitting a small weakness will make you appear honest. It
will also create the impression that with you, what you see is what
you get. They'll believe everything else you've said is fair
comment and probably true.
I wouldn't dare to give any advice to women on how to dress
appropriately for the occasion, but I am prepared to, humbly, stick
my neck out for the men. Are you going for a financial services
job? No, so don't dress like it. Yes, wear a jacket and tie, but
guys, leave the power suit in the wardrobe. You'll look and feel
overdressed. Aim for Indiana Jones at a conference dinner, not a
young executive in a big multinational.
My last piece of advice would be toneverlet your guard
down. Your sociability will almost certainly be tested over lunch.
They'll ask people who met you on the tour of the department what
they thought of you after you've left. Everyone you encounter needs
to be impressed, from the porter to the head of department. So be
prepared to think on your feet and charm them all. You'll end up
feeling exhausted, but if you get your head straight before you
start you'll find it much easier to sell yourself. And with the
best of luck, you might just get that job.