A professor emeritus advises young scientists to deemphasize controversial aspects of their work—or to avoid controversy until they are established.
A desire to prove to disadvantaged students that they, too, could be successful carried Knatokie Ford through her graduate program at Harvard.
In the United Kingdom, recent Ph.D. recipients have weathered the recession in better shape than most.
A recent analysis in neuroscience urges caution both in reading the literature and in designing your own experiments.
A group of ERC Starting Grantees has created a new platform where top young researchers can raise their voices and influence science policy.
Scientists taking part in an open peer-review process can get more recognition and an opportunity to weigh in.
While there are signs that the gender gap in science is closing, more needs to be done at policy level.
There are risks and difficulties in interactive peer review.
A more interactive peer-review process can help authors build recognition, increase their impact, and win priority for their scientific work.
Science Careers looks at the pros and cons for young scientists to take part in interactive peer review processes both as authors and reviewers.
Enter keywords, locations or job types to start searching for your new science career
Opening a free account lets you utilize all the tools you'll need for a successful job search including:
© 2015 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All Rights Reserved.
AAAS is a partner of HINARI, AGORA, OARE, PatientInform, CrossRef, and COUNTER.
You have reached the bottom of the page. Back to top