In part 1 of this series, I described a few general concepts that you need to know about in order to optimize your next job offer. If you haven’t yet read last month’s column, it may be wise to start there , as I'll be referring back to it occasionally. In this continuation, I’ll add another broad concept and then move to a discussion of the strategy that should be a part of your prenegotiation thinking.
The seminar I referred to in part 1, "Negotiation in a Nutshell," was presented in Aspen, Colorado, 3 weeks ago to a group of about 50 professors and department heads; this teaching experience taught me far more about negotiation than I expected. I found the role-play exercise we did especially interesting; it is quite a sight to see senior staff from some of the nation’s top research institutes acting like postdocs looking for their first faculty slot!
I had a great time with this group of senior staff discussing the job-offer negotiation strategies they need to teach their grad students and postdocs. But the most fun definitely came at the beginning of my workshop, when I divided the audience into 25 groups of two people each.
One principal investigator (PI) played the role of a department head, and the other person was a postdoc applying for his or her first tenure-stream job. I gave everyone a confidential information sheet, which they could study prior to the beginning of this 20-minute exercise. These sheets described the unique situation their role-play persona was in. (The department head had problems with the hiring committee, the dean, and the budgets; the applicant had issues with a spouse, another job offer, the lousy local job market, and a handful of other real-life concerns.) But the other person never had an idea what the issues were behind their partner’s negotiation posture, unless they discovered this themselves.
The stated goal of the exercise was to close the deal in 20 minutes, but I had a hidden agenda. I wanted the participants to see how important it is to pay attention to and to learn about their counterpart’s issues. As in a game of Battleship, proper questioning--along with excellent listening skills--can tell you a lot about where the issues lie on the other side. Here’s an example of what I mean:
As I watched and listened, wandering the room to take in pieces of as many of the negotiations as I could, I noticed that some people had used the preparation time and materials to develop a strategy, and others were just winging it.
1) One classic negotiation technique is called “the flinch” in negotiation circles. When a hiring manager extends you an offer, he or she is watching your reaction. This is not the time to use the deadpan expression of a poker player. Instead, react with a slight but visible flinch.
2) Plan your concessions. Know which of your issues are most important and which ones you are OK with losing. Peel off a few that you don’t really care about to help you win the ones you do.
3) Learn as much as you possibly can before the meeting about what may be important to the other side.
4) Don't be afraid to use a deadlock as a negotiation ploy. Standing your ground may force your opponent into revealing how important you are to their organization. This is a last-ditch strategy, however; they may also withdraw the offer.
5) Do you have a small request that can wait until after your agreement? Sometimes, employers are so glad to be done with the process that they’ll allow you to come back for more once the negotiation is over. But don't go overboard, or they may reconsider their offer.
6) Be friendly, keep your antennas up, and learn as much as you can about what is important to the other side. “Don’t build walls; build bridges,” says Chester Karrass, negotiation trainer and speaker.
One of the single most important things you can do in advance of a negotiation like this is to learn as much as you can about the other party’s needs. When you feel that you know why they are interested in you and what exact need you meet for them, you can then develop a strategy around this information that allows you to get what you need from the process. Here’s someone else from our role-playing who used what he knew about the other party in a strategic attempt to lessen the impact of his too-low salary offer:
My attendees that day had only a few minutes to read their information sheet and form a strategy. This left many of them to improvise. Improvisation is another skill that benefits the negotiator, but the ability to think on your feet and move through a situation with grace is a skill not easily taught. Here’s an example I witnessed at this session from a fellow who had no strategy at all, except for a genuinely open and friendly attitude, which by itself has been known to salvage a negotiation for the unprepared:
Job-offer packages are complex, with a lot of ingredients, yet most of us judge an offer solely on salary, or--for the academic--salary and start-up funds. Although this series is called Salary Negotiation, it would be a mistake to assume that salary is the only element of a deal that you should negotiate. Some elements can be fine-tuned to make the whole into more than the sum of its parts. Negotiation should never be thought of as a zero-sum game; if the deal is good, everybody benefits.
I like the laundry list that Laurie Weingart of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, uses in her presentations about job offers. She has granted us permission to reprint it here:
As the table indicates, there are lots of issues to be discussed. Study the list and decide which issues are most important to you. Develop a strategy for your negotiation that involves keeping the things you can't live without while being willing to give way on the items you find less essential (as Susan did, above). As Laurie says in her talks, “Give them what is important to them (but not to you), in exchange for something that is important to you (but not to them).”
The difficulty comes when trying to figure out what is going to be negotiable and what isn’t. That’s where the rub is for this writer as well, because it's different in every organization. In a general sense, if the issue only affects you, it will fall into the “negotiable” category. If it has broad implications for other employees, it probably isn't negotiable. There are some sticky wickets, however, that make it difficult to label this as a general rule.
For example, although vacation days and the number of scientific meetings you get to attend per year are generally set by institutional policy (because they affect everyone), your supervisor may have some flexibility on those, because he or she manages their implementation. That’s why some people get a little extra vacation time or an extra meeting or two per year.
Salary is the stickiest wicket of them all. That’s because some companies see this as an area with an impact on everyone in their organization, especially those at a similar level of education and experience. It's an equity issue: Did you ever find out how much a colleague is making, only to realize it’s more than you earn? How did that make you feel? Not good! That’s why some companies see the salary offer, and even issues such as stock options and bonuses, as non-negotiable. I call these companies “first offer, best offer” employers; they extend what they believe is a fair offer the first time, and if you don’t like it--well, you know what you can do.
But even in a “first offer, best offer” environment, you can still manage to find some wiggle room in areas in which your new supervisor has oversight. Although it may not be stock options or salary, you can probably finagle an extra week of vacation or a new laptop computer.
Not everyone has the philosophy of Ashwin, the department head who just wanted it to work out well for both parties. Some people will fight for every advantage and seek to “win” at all costs. Nobody likes to run into these types, but it happens. When it does, you may have to reflect on the big picture to see whether the job still fits.
Sometimes the end result--the job--is worth giving up more than you had planned. Just remember what Shakespeare wrote in The Merchant of Venice: “He is well paid that is well satisfied.” It’s not always about money.